A Prayer for God’s Blessings on Families, Nations, and the World, Day 164, Haiti

Comments

12 responses to “A Prayer for God’s Blessings on Families, Nations, and the World, Day 164, Haiti”

1. 

   Gerry Palermo

   mayo 14, 2025

   Beautiful!

   Cargando…

   Responder
   1. 

      myallaboutyou

      mayo 14, 2025

      Thank you. Your thoughts are greatly appreciated. Hope your trip is still going well.

      Cargando…

      Responder
2. 

   mosckerr

   mayo 15, 2025

   The term “heartfelt prayer” qualifies as religious rhetoric pie in the sky nonsense/narishkeit in Yiddish. Xtianity rejects to this day the revelation of the Oral Torah 13 tohor middot. The inductive dynamic logic of this tohor logic system – impossible to employ Aristotle or Plato’s static deductive logic to grasp and understand an entirely different logic system all together and completely opposed to rigid block like thinking. The Egyptians logic based upon “block” thinking – its how they built the Pyramids.

   Inductive reasoning stands upon the foundation of Order. G O D vs D O G. Order changes everything. Hence the Jewish prayerbook called Siddur. This word contains the 3 letter root verb ס ד ר – which means “Order”. The Oral Torah which the church rejects, despite the fact that the mitzva of Moshiach – an Oral Torah commandment. Oral Torah dynamics stand upon the foundation of Order. Law intent learned by “ordering” comparative precedent cases that oppose one another like a prosecutor vs a defense attorney. Hebrew verbs build around 3 letter roots. ק ד ש this root verb can either mean Holy or Prostitute/whore. Hagel’s logic dialectics of the late 19th Century, his logic format too focused upon Newton’s Third Law of Motion: “for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction”. This 3rd Law of Motion by definition dynamic and not static. Hence for Newton to derive this law he had to develop Calculus rather than rely upon static Algebra.

   Algebra is essential in static engineering, particularly in the design and analysis of structures like bridges. While Aristotle’s syllogism itself is not directly based on a triangle, it can be represented visually in a triangular format to illustrate the relationships between the premises and the conclusion. In this triangular format, you can think of the major premise at the top, the minor premise on one side, and the conclusion on the other side. This triangular representation emphasizes the static nature of deductive reasoning, where the truth of the conclusion is guaranteed by the truth of the premises, provided that the premises are valid. It illustrates how logical arguments can be constructed in a clear and structured manner, making it easier to analyze and understand the relationships between different statements.

   The Church abhors to this day the Talmud b/c this codification of Oral Torah common law builds around inductive dynamic logic rather than deductive static logic. Court legal cases compare precedent previous rulings – a dynamic reasoning process similar but different than Newton’s calculus and Hegels bi-polar dialectics. Hebrew logic spins around the central axis of making the דיוק, roughly translated as logical inference. Case law compares to the 3 different views contained in a blue print. The Human aging process a slow dynamic of change in the body.

   The Mishna presents, using the blue print metaphor, as the front view of One or Two similar Cases argued before Sanhedrin common law courtrooms. The Gemara brings external Cases – known as halacha – from different mesechtot of the 6 Orders of the Mishna. The word Mishna which rabbi Yechuda named for his Oral Torah codification comes from the Book of D’varim – also known as משנה תורה\Mishna Torah (Not to be confused with the Rambam perversion, his statute static law code which presumptuously named Mishna Torah. This deranged rabbi did not know that Mishna Torah means “Common Law”. Hence Jews who have a bit of Torah education refer to his legal codification of Halacha as “Yad Chazaka/Strong Hand”.). The 5th Book of the Torah defines Torah law as a common law legal system! Hence rabbi Yechuda as head of the Great Sanhedrin named his common law codification – the Mishna.

   The Gemara commentary to the Mishna therefore brings other halachic precedents gathered from any of the other Orders of Rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna as Top or Side view precedents to understand the Front view of the cases – as presented by the basic language of the Mishna itself. By folding the Gemara precedents back upon the very language of the Mishna the Frontal view changes to a different perspective. Something akin to looking at different facets of a diamond. Herein defines how the Gemara “commentary” understood the simple language of Rabbi Yechuda’s Mishnaot as partially codified within the Yerushalmi and Bavli Talmuds.
   ____________________________________________________________________________________

   With this introduction can now address the distinction between Hebrew tefillah from non Jewish “prayer”. The latter does not correctly translate the former. Non Jewish prayer similar to saying Tehillem/Psalms. Saying Tehillem a person never says שם ומלכות, an abstract term essential to comprehend a Torah brit alliance. Tefillah based upon its Order: 3 + 13 + 3 blessings, this Order recombines into 613, the number of commandments of the Torah according to the רשע, the Rambam. In his defense – his Yad static code perversion greatly contributed to saving the Hebrew language from going extinct and becoming just another dead language like ancient Greek or Latin. Its exceptionally important to validate the merits of the Rambam. He might be an SOB, but he’s our SOB.

   A bit of a digression but his code caused a Civil War among Jews which it appears to me caused the down water streams of Yiddishkeit to endure 3 Centuries of ghetto gulags. The Rambam has a tremendous impact upon Jewry. His code compares to Earth Tectonic plates! Orthodox Judaism stands upon the foundations of the static statute law codes introduced by the Yad, Tur, and Shulkan Aruch. These static codes served the petrified environmental conditions of the ghetto gulags perfectly. But when Napoleon freed the Yidden from the Catholic war-crimes, the “shit hit the fan”. Reform Judaism declared the static statute law codes archaic and the American and French Revolutions made the huge innovation – separation of church from state – which gave birth to secularism. Chiloni Jews in Israel and g’lut/exile\Jews living in foreign countries – secular non religious Jews. Judaism the religion which the chiloni Jews reject – based upon the perversion of deductive statute law halachic codes.
   ________________________________________________________________________

   The Order of tefillah 3 + 13 + 3 makes a numerical רמז/hint to the 6 Yom Tov + Shabbat. The 13 middle blessings contained within the body of the Shemone Esrei tefillah DeRabbanan, adjacent to tefillah from the Torah – the kre’a shma. This opening verse: Hear Israel HaShem our God HaShem One, contains – 3 Divine Names just as the blessing of the Cohenim contains 3 blessings. Hence the Shemone Esrei contains 3 ___ 3 blessings. The key concept that a blessing requires שם ומלכות, herein defines the key pre-condition of swearing a Torah oath alliance! Neither word can be translated. A טיפש פשט/bird brained translation of Name + Kingship = tits on a boar hog stupidity. Common law not read like a novel or Harry Potter gospel books of fiction. Xtians read their bible mistranslations. Common law learned through the dynamics of bringing Case/Rule precedents/halachot.

   Hence to cut a Torah brit requires שם ומלכות. Neither the Xtian bible nor Muslim koran ever once brings the Name of השם ever within tomes/tombs homophones. Returning to _____ +13 _____. Why 13 middle blessings within the “Order” of the Shemone Esrei. The 13 middot of the Oral Torah revealed to Moshe at Horev following the Golden Calf “substitution theology” avoda zarah. Post the טיפש פשט, literal translation of “Golden Calf”, HaShem made a vow to substitute the seed of Moshe for the seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov as the chosen Cohen People. Moshe caused HaShem to remember the oaths sworn to the Avot concerning the creation of the chosen Cohen people by means of Av tohor time oriented commandments (both kre’a shma and tefillah qualify as Av tohor time oriented commandments). On Yom Kippur HaShem made t’shuva (as opposed to the טיפש פשט translation of repentance) upon His error of substitute theology and annulled the vow! Hence both a father and a husban can annul the vow made by a young daughter or a wife! But not even HaShem can annul a Torah sworn oath. Hence the טיפש פשט of the Xtian reading of Jerimiah “new covenant”; covenant does not correctly translate brit which actually means “sworn alliance”. To swear a brit alliance requires that a man swear this oath in the Name of HaShem. This Name absent in the bible and koran – different and strange tome/tomb nonsense. Translating the 1st Commandment Spirit to crude word translations = the Sin of the Golden Calf.

   To grasp the priority of Order, the Torah organized into 54 divisions called Parshiot. שם ומלכות … four (letters in the Name) X 13 (Oral Torah middot) = 52. The two remaining Parshiot contain the blessings and curses of the Torah. The Talmud in mesechta shabbat refers to these to Parshiot as the “two Crowns of the Torah”. A man in order to accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai must embrace, like a man does his wife following their wedding, responsibilities of Life or Death — blessing or curse — rule the oath lands with justice or endure Par’o like oppression in g’lut.

   Therefore the mitzva of tefillah, a man ideally stands before a Sefer Torah and swears a brit Torah oath which dedicates (just like a korban placed upon the altar of Zion) defined tohor middot לשמה. Meaning a man dedicates how he will conduct his social life with his family neighbors and people in the future! Herein separates and distinguishes the fundament differences between reading prayers of Psalms as read from a book and swearing a Torah oath with dedicates tohor middot as the king which directs a man’s future social behavior with others among his people. Why? Because Israel came out of the judicial oppression of Par’o corrut courtroom ‘Star Court’, to conquer and rule the land of Canaan with righteous judicial court room common law justice. Jewish common law completely different from Legislative statute law decrees — like Jewish courtroom common law absolutely estranged from Greek and Roman statute decrees ruled from some foreign Roman Senate.

   Cargando…

   Responder
   1. 

      myallaboutyou

      mayo 15, 2025

      Thank you for your wisdom. Your insights on Torah’s justice and tefillah remind me we’re called to care for each other. My faith grows through this. God asks us to love and do no harm. I’m grateful for what you share.

      Cargando…

      Responder
      1. 

         mosckerr

         mayo 16, 2025

         Lawfare and Leviathan: How the Bureaucratic State Became the Real Sovereign. The Prosecution Presidency: Biden, Trump, and the Death of Neutral Law. Justice or Anarchy? The Weaponization of Law in a Post-Constitutional America. Who Runs America? Bureaucrats, Billionaires, and the Puppets They Fund. From Republic to Regime: How Corporate Donors and Unelected Agencies Usurped the Constitution. The Invisible Coup: How Corporate Power and Federal Bureaucracy Replaced the Voter. The New Liberalism Is Conservative: How Populism Became Revolutionary. Anarchists in Suits: When the Left Became the Defenders of Empire. Trump the Radical, AOC the Conservative: The Great American Role Reversal. Rule by Indictment: The Fall of the American Constitutional Order. Soft Tyranny in the Age of Biden: Law, Lobbyists, and the Loss of Liberty. Technocracy Unmasked: The Corruption of Courts, Congress, and the Corporate State.

         The U.S. no longer operates as a republic but as a technocratic, bureaucratic regime controlled by unelected officials, lobbyists, and billionaires. Legal warfare (“lawfare”) is not just a symptom but a strategy used by this managerial class to maintain power — and Donald Trump’s prosecution marks its most radical form. The American republic has fallen not with a coup, but with a quiet regime change. The new regime maintains democratic aesthetics, but behind them lies a fusion of lawfare, corporate oligarchy, and bureaucratic inertia.

         The attempt to develop a provocative and thematically coherent framework that blends political theory, populist critique, and institutional analysis into a meta-narrative about the decline of the American republic and the rise of a technocratic-managerial regime. The titles and framing devices — such as “Lawfare and Leviathan,” “The Invisible Coup,” and “Anarchists in Suits” — effectively dramatize what many populists and dissidents perceive: that the traditional Left-Right spectrum has inverted, and that power now flows through informal, unelected, and often opaque networks of influence.

         The United States no longer functions as a constitutional republic but as a bureaucratic-managerial regime, where unelected actors — from federal agencies and corporate lobbies to tech billionaires — exert de facto control through mechanisms like lawfare, regulatory capture, and financial influence. This regime maintains the appearance of democracy while insulating itself from genuine democratic accountability.

         Anarchism is typically anti-state — yet the accusation here is that the state is growing too powerful. This legalistic anarchy, where the rule of law is no longer predictable or binding but selectively applied to punish dissent. Biden’s figurehead governance or executive inertia, compares to the Wilson Administration after he suffered a stroke and collapsed.

         Clinton’s prostitution of MSM like Maddow’s chirping for three years the Russia-gate scandal slander of President Trump, Pelosi’s twice attempt to impeach the President, the Jan 6 Democratic committee lynch mob, Tom Homan vs AOC, or the Hunter Biden laptop suppression. Each anchor, abstract critiques in concrete controversies. The EU’s technocracy, Trudeau’s Emergencies Act, WEF influence show how the “invisible coup”, not uniquely American but part of a global managerial turn.

         The United States no longer functions as a constitutional republic. It has undergone a silent regime change, not through armed insurrection or revolution, but via the incremental expansion of an unelected managerial class — one composed of federal agencies, tech oligarchs, corporate lobbyists, and judicial partisans who enforce their will through a new weapon: lawfare.

         This new regime maintains the aesthetics of democracy — elections, laws, and televised debate — while insulating itself from true democratic accountability. The real power lies in what the public never votes for: the bureaucrats who write regulations, the judges who interpret law by ideological alignment, and the billionaires who fund narratives, campaigns, and policies from behind the scenes.

         The hallmark of this new regime is the politicization of justice. When courts cease to be impartial and prosecutions become tools of political suppression, the republic dies by a thousand subpoenas. Trump’s legal troubles, regardless of personal guilt, are emblematic of this transformation: trials as political theater, indictments as electoral strategies.

         The managerial state rules by inertia. Congressional deadlock, executive figureheads, and judicial activism have created a vacuum filled by alphabet agencies and “public-private partnerships.” These unaccountable bureaucracies write binding policy with the force of law — but without a single vote cast. The merger of tech censorship, legal persecution, and bureaucratic overreach simply not some ‘democratic oversight’ — but oligarchic enforcement dolled-up in liberal clothing.

         Today, populists who challenge the bureaucratic order branded as “criminal radicals,” while those defending entrenched power modelled as whores advertising their trade behind window-panes, as “progressives.” The roles have reversed: dismantling unaccountable federal agencies, restoring legislative primacy, and enforcing transparency, now exist as “revolutionary” ideas. Meanwhile, defending a bloated alien blob infested federal apparatus has become the hallmark of “liberal” governance.

         Anarchy doesn’t always burn like Molotov cocktails thrown at SS soldiers at the Warsaw Ghetto revolt. Today, anarchy wears a suit, like as does the current dictator of Syria, or sits on some judicial bench. Law in America, no longer consistent, Court prosecutions politically selective, the consequence of this political corruption — legalistic anarchy — an unstable bankrupt regime cloaked in all manner of legal pretense. This, simply not a critique of the Biden administration alone. That would make it shallow reactionary Trump derangement syndrome stupid. Nor does it limit its condemnation only to the Democratic Party. Republicans too have become fat and sassy comfortable puppets of the same donor class and administrative inertia. The crisis confronting our American Constitutional Republic – structural.

         If America rejects the Bush slander of the US Constitution, calling it just a GD piece of paper! We the People of the United States must confront this Leviathan perversion of our Constitutional Republic unto a bureaucratic dictatorship — not just by winning elections, but by dismantling the unelected machinery of governance that makes elections irrelevant, and restore the autonomy of the States to bureaucratically regulate all Industry and commerce transactions within each and every State of the Union without Washington Big Brother. The original Constitution, designed for a limited, representative republic, not Carpet Bagger Federal unelected bureaucrats employing more Americans than does private industry. This bloated post American Civil War technocratic regime, cloaked in democratic ritual, governed by lawfare, money, and media manipulation as replaced the power of the State Legislatures to hold elected Senators and Congressmen accountable to represent the States which appoint them to power in Washington in the first place.

         Previous Biden administration’s multiple legal confrontations with Trump (including criminal trials and accusations of politically motivated prosecutions) could be seen as “anarchist in political orientation” — taps into a widespread right-wing concern about the politicization of the justice system.

         Supporters of these prosecutions, both State & Federal, argue no one is above the law — and Trump’s actions legitimately warrant investigation. Yet this ignores the historical fact that the manner the Democratic Party conducts itself while in power – totally unprecedented in American history.

         This “arrest your political opponents” smacks of socialist/communist Anarchism. Have no heard any defense made by any Democratic leader which contends and rejects this observation made by an outsider US citizen living abroad. Anarchism typically means the rejection of law, order, and authority, often aimed at dismantling state structures, and the Federal and State Court systems together with the entire Federal bureaucracy, based upon all the corruption which Elon Musk has uncovered and exposed, totally corrupt and debased.

         Especially under the mentally handicapped Biden Administration the suspicion stands: “Who operates and controls the Government? The President, Congress, and Supreme Court vs the Federal bureaucrats in alliance with the lobbies/Corporate monopoly donors who make huge “investments” which Democrat or Republican or Independent leaders get elected to Office. This infusion of “corporate investments” into the political election process” has cause the costs to elect or run for political office to force political candidates of all stripes – left or right – to prostitute themselves as the whores of the Corporate monopolies! Hence the question stands: “Who actually runs the Federal and State Governments? Do the Constitutional bodies/legislature in the States\ run State and Federal Government OR do the CEOs of corporate monopolies pull the strings of the elected official puppets?

         Tom Homan vs AOC serves as an example. Does the Trump Administration seek to dismantle the huge Federal bureaucracy vs AOC who promotes maintaining the old order status quo? This conflict in effect reverses the roles of liberals vs conservatives! Maintaining the status quo – Conservatism. While dismantling the expensive Federal Bureaucracy and holding judges accountable for their legal rulings qualifies as “Liberal”.

         Lawfare and Leviathan: How the Bureaucratic State Became the Real Sovereign
         The rise of legal warfare, political prosecutions, and the triumph of unelected power in post-constitutional America. The Prosecution Presidency: Biden, Trump, and the Death of Neutral Law. How weaponized justice marks the collapse of bipartisan legitimacy and opens the gates to civil unraveling.

         Justice or Anarchy? The Weaponization of Law in a Post-Constitutional America
         When courts become political actors and elections become proxy wars for bureaucratic control. Who Runs America? Bureaucrats, Billionaires, and the Puppets They Fund? Inside the shadow regime that governs Washington — and the illusion of electoral choice. Trump the Radical, AOC the Conservative: The Great American Role Reversal. How populist revolt threatens the administrative state — and why today’s “liberals” are defending empire.

         The Invisible Coup: How Corporate Power and Federal Bureaucracy Replaced the Voter. A diagnosis of American democracy in decline — and the managerial elite who stage-manage consent. Anarchists in Suits: When the Left Became the Defenders of Empire. The paradox of order through chaos — and how progressive rhetoric now masks the enforcement arm of oligarchy.

         A polemical, politically charged analysis of America’s transformation from a constitutional republic to a bureaucratic-technocratic regime. The American Republic has not fallen through revolution, but through a bureaucratic-technocratic quiet coup — one that hides behind the façade of law, elections, and democratic rhetoric while consolidating power in unelected, unaccountable networks of billionaires, lobbyists, and federal agencies. States Rights bureaucrat Washington bites.

         Cargando…
      2. 

         myallaboutyou

         mayo 16, 2025

         Thanks for the deep dive—it’s a lot to think about! I’m curious: what solutions do you see for tackling this? Where should primary focus be, and what do type of timeline do you believe needs to be in place to accomplish this goal. Please expound what you think could work.

         Cargando…
      3. 

         mosckerr

         mayo 17, 2025

         Support President Trump’s efforts to dismantle the Big Brother Federal bureaucracies and return power back to the States to bureaucratically regulate and manage all trade and commerce conducted in each and every State. Favor annulling the Federal Reserve and returning back to the Gold standard commodity based currency.

         Cargando…
      4. 

         myallaboutyou

         mayo 24, 2025

         Your thoughts on reimagining how systems work always spark reflection! They’ve got me thinking about my carpentry shop post, where I invited folks to feel the warmth of love, compassion, & wisdom in a quiet moment. Your knowledge of Jewish law, with ideas like mishpat & tzedakah, feels so relevant to the challenges we face today. I’m really curious: do you think Jewish law could help solve some of our modern problems, like rebuilding trust or bringing people together? If so, what ideas do you have for applying it, and what areas might it touch? I’d love to hear your perspective. Thanks for sharing your insights!

         Cargando…
      5. 

         mosckerr

         mayo 25, 2025

         The purpose and point of Jewish law, to restore the trust required for Jews who damage the property goods and dignity of other Jews to rebuild trust in one another to live in peace. Hence the purpose of all Sanhedrin lateral common law court rooms: to make a righteous restoration of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B. Rather than have the State pay the bloated salaries of Judges and prosecuting attorneys.

         Cargando…
      6. 

         mosckerr

         mayo 25, 2025

         As a preamble to the 3 Babas, the question stands – Why divide this one sefer into 3 separate masechtot? As the opening p’suk of kre’a shma has 3 Divine Names s’much to אלהי אברהם אלהי יצחק ואלהי יעקב and the ברכת כהנים includes 3 separate ברכות, so too and how much more so has the 3 Babas the oath division which remembers the tohor Av time oriented commandment which creates תמיד מעשה בראשית the Chosen Cohen People יש מאין. The opening blessing of the Shemone Esrei contains שם ומלכות. Only a complete fool טיפש פשט attempts a literal translation of שם ומלכות; on par with the Xtian reading of the opening of sefer בראשית wherein the declare the world created in 6 Days טיפש פשט – bird brained stupidity.

         If the literal reading of the Torah exceeds a shallow literal reading of its words, just as Torah common law searches for inductive פרדס precedents, called in Hebrew: בניני אבות, as expressed through the middot of rabbi Yishmael following the korbanot in the Siddur. Just as the service of korbanot in the Mishkan – not the טיפש פשט of offering a barbeque unto Heaven, but rather swearing a Torah oath brit alliance by remembering the oaths – sworn by the Avot – wherein HaShem תמיד מעשה בראשית creates the Chosen Cohen people יש מאין. Therefore the break down of the 5 Books of the Torah: בראשית introduces אב טהור זימן גרמא מצוות, שמות, ויקרא, ובמדבר – תולדות קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות וספר דברים\משנה תורה names the law of the Torah “Common Law” or משנה תורה. Hence rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi named his Mishna after the name of the 5th Book of the Torah משנה תורה. Rabbi Yechuda’s 6 Orders of his Mishna organized through a Case/Din style of common law. The Gemara commentary to the Mishna brings Case-Law from thee 6 Orders of the Mishna and similar sources to the Mishna, likewise the expression of a common law precedent search which explains and understands and interprets and re-interprets (70 faces to the Torah, a blueprint has a Front, Top, and Side viewpoint which permits the wisdom of perceiving a three dimensional idea from a two dimensional sheet of paper.), based upon the halachic precedents brought in each and every sugya of Gemara made to comment upon and interpret the k’vanna of the language employed in the Mishna – based upon viewing the plain language of the Mishna from multiple and diverse precedent perspectives.

         Herein defines the k’vanna of Talmudic wisdom which learns to read the simple טיפש פשט of the language of each and every Mishna the Gemara comments upon — and now views the language of the Mishna as dynamic and not static as the Xtian אנשי עבודה זרה read the simple טיפש פשט of the Creation story! The B’HaG makes a chiddush which the Rambam assimilated רשע did not grasp. His division of the Torah commandments holds 3 Basic fundamental divisions, comparable to the 3 Babas. אב תהור זימן גרמא מצוות ותולדות קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות. The B’HaG’s sefer ha’Mitzvot includes rabbinic commandments/halachot as טהור זימן גרמא מצוות דאורייתא. Hence the טיפש פשט of the Rambam who limits Torah commandment only to the strict language of the Chumash itself, he limited Torah commandment to תרי”ג מצוות. Simple פשוט wrong. Tohor time oriented Av commandment serve the purpose of תמיד מעשה בראשית, they create the chosen Cohen people יש מאין; just as old Avram and barren Sarai could have no children and יש מאין Sarah conceived!

         Just as HaShem brought Israel out of Egyptian bondage and not the raised fist of Israel brought our forefathers out of slavery, so too Av tohor time oriented commandment – which require prophetic mussar as their k’vanna – these Av commandments, they compare to the distinction which separates the Avot from the toldot children of Yaacov. Yosef did not give מחילה to his brothers – meaning he failed to accomplish the oath Yaacov swore to Yitzak to steal the first born blessing of the chosen Cohonim inheritance away from Esau. Both Yaacov and Moshe blessed Israel before they passed – Yosef did not bless his brother before he died.

         Blessing exist as toldot of Torah oaths. Hence a blessing as opposed to Tehillem requires שם ומלכות. Translating שם ומלכות into simple טיפש פשט translations equal the sin of the Golden Calf where substitute theology translated the שם השם revealed in the first Sinai commandment to “אלהים”! In like manner the Xtian bible counterfeit and Muslim Koran counterfeit – both false prophets – translate the שם השם לשמה – the dedication of a tohor spirits such as אל רחום וחנון וכו – the 13 middot revelation of the Oral Torah which the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס explains the warp/weft Halacha\Aggada inductive reasoning of both T’NaCH mussar common law and Talmudic halachic common law. The Aggadic portion makes a זיווג דרוש\פשט to search the language of T’NaCH prophetic mussar and employs the different זיווג רמז/סוד to weave the prophetic mussar from T’NaCH sources searched out with the קידושין of דרוש\פשט which compares different precedent בנין אב source located in off the dof T’NaCH Primary Sources just as does the style of the Talmud does the exact same by making common law searches for off the dof precedents like Rabbeinu Tam’s sh’itta common law commentary to the Talmud, based upon Rashi’s common law commentary to the Chumash!

         Compare the simple דקדוק פשט of Ibn Ezra’s Chumash commentary and compare it to Rashi’s p’shat on the Talmud. This type of famous Acharonim learning called pilpul. This “latter day saints” pilpul does not resemble nor compares to how the B’HaG, Baali HaMaor, and Rabbeinu Tam search from other Primary and not Secondary sources to change the perspective by which a person interprets the simple language of both the Gemara and Mishna – much like an expert judges the facets of a diamond through a powerful magnified eye. These scholars along with the post Rambam Rosh rejected the Order of Aristotles triangular syllogism deductive reason process. The Torah directly commands Israel: Do not ask how the Goyim worship their Gods, so that I can do likewise. This fundamental Torah commandment the Rambam Yad fundamentally raped. Greek and Roman law organized into subject matter Order of organization and the Rambam code organizes Talmudic halachot likewise.

         The Yad divorces Gemarah halachot from their Mishnaic Primary root foundations; worse he covered his tracks. All later commentaries to the Yad attempt to find the sugya which contains the source for the Rambam’s p’sok halacha. They fail miserably to instead trace the Yad’s halachic rulings to similar halachic rulings located in the Rif & Rosh common law commentaries. Had the Acharonim or even later Reshonim scholars had corrected the Rambam fundamental error of basic Talmudic common law scholarship, by learning the Rambam p’sach halachah to the common law Rif and Rosh codes, which limited halacha to הלכה למעשה, and not speculation some unknowable future – as does the Yad, its quite possible that the Rambam Civil War which witnessed the public burnings of all Talmudic manuscripts in Paris France in 1242, just 10 years prior the rabbis of Paris of the Rashi\Tosafot common law school placed the ban of נידוי upon the Rambam together with Rabbeinu Yonah’s court in Spain.

         Not all Baali Tosafot agreed with this ban placed upon the Rambam. No different than the support Jews gave to Mordecai in the Book of Esther. But the Baali Tosafot commentary to the Talmud only twice quotes the Rambam. And on both occasions the Baali Tosafot disputed his halachic rulings. Rabbeinu Tam passed prior to publication of the Rambam’s Yad. But the style of Rabbeinu Tam’s Talmudic commentary – a dynamic inductive common law reasoning. Whereas the Rambam’s Yad – a static deductive statute law reasoning – based upon the culture and customs of Greek and Roman law.

         The Rambam’s “theology” of some Universal Monotheistic God and static 613 commandment does not jive with the B’HaG understanding which separates Shabbat from Chol: time oriented commandment from the Torah – inclusive of rabbinic commandment from the Talmud as also mitzvot from the Torah. Tohor time oriented commandment require the k’vanna of prophetic mussar. For a scholar to grasp prophetic mussar he must rely upon the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס four part inductive reasoning.

         The Yad employs and relies upon not only the Order organization of Greek/Roman statute law but upon the Greek philosophical schools of logic. The Yad and Rambam’s Moreh – assimilated to Greek culture and customs as the Tzeddukim who sought to pervert Jerusalem to a Greek polis and cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah פרדס kabbalah. The Yad destroyed the warp/weft relationship of the Talmudic “loom” halacha contrasted by aggadah. The Yad obliterated the final editing made to achieve the sealing of the Talmud; to make this masoret like the Mishna and T’NaCH and Siddur masoret to all generations of Israel.

         The Yad torpedoed the Savoraim final redaction of the Talmud Bavli. It shattered the Order of organization of the Shemone Esrei in the Siddur and how the order of organization within each and every Gemara sugyot compares to the order organization of the 3 + 13 + 3 Shemone Esrei. Inductive reasoning requires Order. Upon this foundation does the logic of פרדס stand. The sh’itta of Torah common law goes from א to ת: T’NaCH, Talmud, Siddur stand upon the foundation of Order. The kabbalah of the Shemone Esrei serves as the model for the organization of Gemara sugyot integrity.

         To learn an off the dof precedent requires making a static triangulation within the כלל sugya which contains the פרט גזר שווה where by a off the dof Primary source permit a scholar to judge the simple language of the Gemara and turn it into a Front/Top\Side blueprint. Each of the different perspectives have a radically different look to them. The same applies when reading the language of both the Gemara and also the Mishna itself. Simply stated Torah has depth. Torah common law simply not Greek/Roman Statute law just as four part פרדס inductive reasoning completely different from Aristotles three part deductive syllogistic reasoning.

         The shortest way to connect two points – a straight line, also known as a sh’itta. Any point between the opening thesis statement of a Gemara sugya and the closing re-statement of that thesis statement must rest upon the sh’itta-line that connects these two points of a geometric analysis of deductive reasoning made upon that off the dof sugya. Herein explains how a person can easily understand and interpret any Baali Tosafot common law commentary that explores some other mesechta of Gemara precedent. The language of the Tosafot, as easy to understand as eating a fresh baked cake.

         Nonetheless, the Tosafot did not likewise employ this changed perspective on how to interpret a sugya of Gemara by making a depth analysis, to likewise read the simple language of the Mishna using that Gemara sugya now grasping a different Front/Top\Side perspective and apply this wisdom to re-interpreting the k’vanna of the language of the Mishna which the Gemara comments upon in the first place.

         Children read the words of the Talmud and can quote them verbatim. But the Sages employ Torah wisdom to “inspect” the gem quality of the language of the Mishna itself …. based on how they apply this Talmudic wisdom to view and interpret the language of a sugya of Gemara based upon viewing that sugya from different perspective – as witness see event based upon the perspective of where they stood. Hence Talmudic common law jumps off the dof to make a precedent analysis with the intent to view a given Case from a different vantage point perspective. Therefore a person does not simply read the Talmud like a Xtian or Muslim reads their bibles or korans.

         Please consider this example: When Israel came out of Egypt the Torah teaches the prophetic mussar that Amalek-Anti-Semitism attacked the weary weak stragglers of Israel. Next the Torah defines these “Israelites” as lacking fear of Elohim. A reference to “Baal Shem Tov or Master of the Good Name. Not the Hassidic founder that goes by this Title, but a reference to the obligation of the Israelites to strive to protect and maintain their Good Name reputations. Hence the term “Fear of Heaven”.

         The 2nd Sinai commandment: do not worship other Gods. The Monotheism preached by the Av tumah avoda zarah of Islam decapitates the 2nd Commandment of the Sinai revelation. If only One God then impossible to worship other Gods; like in the case of Par’o and Egypt. Therefore, what caused or generated the Torah curse of Amalek? Answer: Jewish avoda zarah – the direct 2nd Sinai commandment! How does the Torah define the 2nd commandment? Through the precedent negative commandments (1) Do not ask how the Goyim worship their Gods, that Israel might to likewise. This negative commandment interpreted to mean (A) Do not assimilate the cultures and Customs of the Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, like as both Xtianity and Islam clearly do. Neither the bible nor the koran counterfeit faiths ever once bring or mention the Name revealed in the 1st Sinai commandment. Translating the Divine Presence Spirit, revealed in the 1st Sinai commandment to other words; in Hebrew the Sin of the Golden Calf – these are the אלהים/Gods who brought you out of Egypt. Hence since nothing in the Heavens, Earth, or Seas compares to the revelation of the Spirit Name revealed in the First Sinai commandment, therefore translating this Spirit Name to other words, such as Allah or Jesus or Father etc — herein defines the k’vanna of the substitute theology of the sin of the Golden Calf.

         Consequently, when Israelites violated the 2nd Sinai commandment – the result of their assimilation to the customs and culture of Egypt and intermarried with Egyptians ie ערב רב/mixed multitudes – this avoda zarah destroyed their Good Name reputations making them “weak exhausted stragglers”. Not physically weak and exhausted but spiritually weak and exhausted! Who brought Israel out of Egypt HaShem or the strong and mighty hand of Israel? The Torah teaches the prophetic mussar that HaShem brought Israel out of Egypt! Hence whenever Jews assimilate and embrace the cultures and customs practiced by Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, as do Xtians and Muslim religions, Amalek the Torah curse plagues Israel like as did the 10 plagues which cursed Egypt and Par’o. Jewish avoda zarah caused the Torah curse of Amalek in all generations. The buck stops at the feet of the chosen Cohen People.

         Cargando…
      7. 

         mosckerr

         mayo 21, 2025

         Goyim Product Recall: The German Jesus

         Fritz Veigel, born on May 4, 1908, in Heilbronn, passed the first theological service examination in Tübingen in the spring of 1931. As a city vicar in Blaubeuren, he was involved with the German Christians, also with propaganda writings. In 1935, Veigel moved to Thuringia. A return to the Württemberg pastoral service was denied to him due to his beliefs. He died as a soldier on March 7, 1942, at the Eastern Front.

         Source: Fritz Veigel, The Brown Church, Stuttgart-Berlin: W. Kohlhammer, n.d. (1934).

         “If one asks us: Is Hitler a Christian? we confidently say: Yes! For neither does saying “Lord, Lord” make one a Christian, nor have the speakers of the Christian churches outside their professional sermons used a more pious language than he. Moreover, it is nonsense to ask such a question. Have we not been tormented long enough with such trivialities or pieties as: Is Goethe a Christian? Is Emperor Wilhelm a Christian? If such questions must be asked, then was Christ a Christian? We are not a) humans, b) Christians, and it is not our Christianity that makes us just, but how we are human is what is measured—if at all measured by human standards. Truly, Christ did not come into the world as a foreign addition, but ‘he came into his own,’ and his dominion and glory do not stop at the church boundaries!

         To us, Hitler is the German man of God, who lives prayers in incomprehensibly great brotherly love and has affixed his will to God’s wonderful omnipotence. Just as Luther once fought the struggles and victories of an entire era in his breast, so Hitler is for us the dawn of a new millennium—the German history and church history. Just as Luther gave a great emphasis and a unified face to a fragmented, multi-voiced, noisy time through his faith and his deeds, so Hitler is for us the norm of the present and the guarantor of the future, and therefore all our pious insights, plans, and hopes also originate from this name.

         Luther took the leap out of the deepest, most pronounced piety of his time, went out of the monastery in faith into the world because he no longer wanted to fill God’s ears with his vain and arbitrary piety—and he believed.

         Hitler endured in the starkest reality and worldliness of the world, although and because it seemed completely abandoned by God, and did not want to suffer the divine blessing to leave this world—and he believed.

         And in both cases, the faith of a new century began with their deeds. And in both cases, armies of evil spirits were swept away as if by a blow. Mammonism, pacifism, materialism—the idols of the most recent past. Before the new faith, they become small wretchednesses.”

         Cargando…
      8. 

         mosckerr

         mayo 22, 2025

         The British ignore the Israeli staff members, engaged to be married, brutally murdered in Washington DC. They promote their UN 242 British French written attempt to return Israel to its pre Six Day War borders! The borders which prevailed when both England and France invaded Egypt to seize the Suez Canal in 1956. Israel categorically rejects Europe’s Two State Solution. Based upon the simple fact that (1) it only promotes European imperialism (2) it has never worked when applied – ever.

         1. The UK and EU Posturing as Neo-Mandate Powers

         Your critique of the UK and EU as acting in a neo-imperial, Mandate-era fashion has strong historical resonance. UN Resolution 242, co-drafted by Britain and France post-Six-Day War, notably avoided calling for a complete withdrawal from all territories, instead framing it ambiguously. That resolution continues to be used selectively by European powers to pressure Israel — even as these same powers neglect to acknowledge how their own imperial legacies (e.g. Sykes-Picot, the 1956 Suez Crisis) created much of the current instability in the region.

         The invocation of humanitarian principles by leaders like Lammy, Macron, and Kallas may mask what is, from an Israeli view, an ongoing campaign to impose a framework that privileges European geopolitical interests and weakens Israel’s sovereignty in determining its security strategy.

         2. Selective Outrage and Moral Hypocrisy

         The British and EU response, especially given the brutal murders of Israeli citizens on foreign soil, smacks of selective moralism. Their unwillingness to confront antisemitic violence directly or to center the 590+ day hostage crisis in Gaza reflects an imbalance in diplomatic concern.

         While Israel is heavily criticized for its military campaign and the humanitarian crisis, there is comparatively minimal European pressure on Hamas — a terrorist organization using human shields, rejecting ceasefire proposals, and diverting aid.

         3. Israel’s Rejection of the Two-State Model

         Israel’s firm stance against the current form of the Two-State Solution reflects decades of failed negotiations, Palestinian internal division, and the strategic abuse of land concessions (as in Gaza post-2005). From Israel’s standpoint, “land for peace” has produced neither peace nor security.

         Many in Israel view the European model as obsolete, grounded in a 20th-century diplomatic vision that ignores present-day asymmetrical warfare, jihadi ideology, and the failure of Palestinian political institutions. Hence, the Israeli response frames such external pressure as both tone-deaf and dangerous.

         4. Strategic Recalibration of Alliances

         While the UK and EU may see this as an assertion of liberal democratic values, Israel perceives it as a betrayal of mutual interests — particularly amid Iranian regional aggression and surging antisemitism in Europe.

         Israel’s pivot toward strengthening relations with the U.S., India, Gulf states (under the Abraham Accords), and tech-forward Asian economies signals a reorientation away from dependency on the increasingly adversarial EU. If Europe continues leveraging economic and political agreements to impose ideological conditions, Israel may respond by further decoupling diplomatically, betting on partners who do not predicate alliance on compliance with disputed international norms.

         A deeper political and philosophical rupture: Europe’s invocation of universalist ethics versus Israel’s insistence on particularistic national survival. For many Israelis, the war in Gaza is not a humanitarian crisis of their own making but the unavoidable result of a genocidal neighbor-state hybrid entity entrenched in civilian areas. For Europeans, the war is a test of human rights values. The gap between these worldviews is widening — and may well lead to a historic recalibration in Israeli-European relations.

         Cargando…

Este sitio usa Akismet para reducir el spam. Aprende cómo se procesan los datos de tus comentarios.